europaoil.co.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the europaoil.co.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host europaoil.co.uk. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is Webfusion Internet Solutions .

the related websites

europaoil.com lse.co.uk urlm.co.uk iii.co.uk proactiveinvestors.co.uk hl.co.uk oilandgasjobsearch.com gb.kompass.com 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called nginx containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

linkedin menu posts drilling headlines 2017 headlines 2016 headlines 2015 headlines 2014 headlines drilling diary resources sites applications and decisions research and reports 14th licensing round councils inquiries about contact drill or drop? independent journalism on fracking, onshore oil and gas and the reactions to it search for...  regulation europa’s leith hill oil drilling plans contain “significant errors, inconsistencies and omissions” – review by ruth hayhurst on march 28, 2018 • ( 19 comments ) bury hill wood, the site of europa’s oil exploration site near leith hill in surrey. photo: drillordrop an independent review has made “major criticisms” of europa’s application for an environmental permit for oil drilling plans near leith hill in surrey. the review, commissioned by local campaigners and funded through a 38 degrees petition, concluded: “many significant errors, inconsistencies and omissions have been identified throughout the documents reviewed.” review of europa’s permit application for bury hill wood (pdf) it said the application did not “facilitate public consultation” and questioned whether it met environment agency standards. the review highlighted: failure to include up-to-date information and follow guidance lack of information on final site design needless and excessive repetition typographical errors and muddled terminology documents that were not fit for purpose inconsistencies on materials and measurements the authors, from two environmental consultancies, also criticised the one-month public consultation as “a wholly inadequate time period in which to robustly review” the application. they said they had not had time to review europa’s waste management plan and said the environment agency’s role as regulator had been “frustrated”: “there is insufficient opportunity for an alternative technical viewpoint to be presented and as such limit the ability of the environment agency to make a fully informed objective assessment.” the environment agency (ea) said last month it was minded to approve the permit , which is one of the final hurdles to europa’s plans for oil drilling at the site at bury hill wood, in the surrey hills area of outstanding natural beauty. ( link to draft decision document ) the ea said it had taken into account “all relevant considerations and legal requirements” and the permit, currently in draft form would “ensure that a high level of protection is provided for the environment and human health.” it did, however, invite public comments as part of a final consultation , which closes tomorrow (29 march 2018). keith taylor (to left of ‘save leith hill’ face) with campaigners at bury hill wood. photo: drillordrop the green party mep, keith taylor, has urged the ea to allow more time: “campaigners are asking that, if the environment agency is not carrying out its own independent assessment, they are given an opportunity to provide more evidence on which an informed decision can be made. i support that call wholeheartedly and have asked the environment agency to make the necessary adjustments to allow for the report to be completed and considered as part of the consultation. an informed decision rather than a quick one is better for all involved.” the permit application was submitted in april 2017. link to drillordrop report details site condition report – “demonstrably inadequate” the review, submitted to the ea today , assessed documents submitted by europa for the permit, as well as official guidance. one of the company’s key application documents was a 307-page site condition report. europa said: “this document has been provided as a record of the site condition prior to commencing exploratory operations.” europa also said of the site condition report: “in addition to the desk study, primary data has been collected from a number of other sources including the hydrogeological risk assessment.” but the review said the site condition report did not present any quantitative measurements of the environmental conditions at and around the site. it also did not give details of the final site design. “it does not form a record of the site condition in the sense implied by the environment agency guidance and is considered demonstrably inadequate for the purposes that it set out to achieve.” the review said there were inconsistencies and confusion about the area of the site and the proposed surface materials. in places, the report referred to an aggregate cover of 250mm depth but in others it mentioned a depth of 300mm or the alternative of ground matting. these issues are relevant in any proposals for managing water that falls on the site. the review said: “due to these inconsistencies it is not possible to have sufficient confidence in the water management calculations presented. “no reason is given as to why site design has not been finalised prior to seeking the permit; or the basis of considering ground matting as an optional component of the design.” the review also said the site condition report did not refer to the latest geological mapping but relied on smaller-scale maps dating from 1933. it said more extensive quaternary deposits shown on the most up-to-date maps suggested there was a “potential direct hydrogeological connection” between a lower greensand outlier and the aquifer which supplies drinking water to dorking. but this was not mentioned in the application. the review pointed to what it called “failings in geological understanding”, which it said had “important implications” for the risk assessment included with the application. the terminology on containment systems to prevent pollution were muddled, the review said. it added that common design standards for these systems were not included in the site design. the company had proposed the use of a bentofix membrane to build secondary containment bunds. but the review said this was “sub-standard” for oil sites because the membrane was flammable. “the failure to incorporate these commonplace standards in site design is not acceptable for a modern industrial facility.” opponents hand in a 38 degrees petition against europa’s permit application, 16 march 2018. groundwater risk assessment “not fit for purpose” the bury hill wood site is on a principal aquifer in the lower greensand rocks. but in its application, europa said: “once the wellsite is established there is “essentially no hydrogeological risk to groundwater and surface water receptors associated with the drilling and testing phases of the proposed development”. the review criticised the application for what it said was “an extremely limited” discussion of groundwater flow in the aquifer. there was, it said, no discussion of issues such as porosity, hydraulic conductivity, transmissivity, storage, recharge or hydraulic gradient. the application used a qualitative risk assessment for groundwater, the review said, because europa concluded there were few, or only insignificant uncertainties. but the review said this decision was not supported by evidence or a risk screening exercise, in contravention of the ea’s guidance. “this coupled with the failure to present basic hydrogeological information and hence a failure to describe the groundwater system in anything other than the most rudimentary detail, mean that the risk assessment is not fit for purpose.” groundwater monitoring plans “inconsistent” the review said europa’s proposed three-month period of baseline monitoring of groundwater was “inconsistent with establishing a natural baseline, for which at a minimum one hydrological year’s worth of data are required”. europa first applied to drill at bury hill wood in december 2008. the review said: “the total failure to obtain any baseline information whatsoever during this period appears to illustrate a considerable lack of foresight, further undermining confidence in the applicant’s ability to accurately assess the risks associated with the application.” location of the bury hill wood sit

URL analysis for europaoil.co.uk

https://drillordrop.com/2018/03/28/europas-leith-hill-oil-drilling-plans-contain-significant-errors-inconsistencies-and-omissions-review//#comment-form-load-service:twitter
https://drillordrop.com/tag/leith-hill/
https://drillordrop.com/about/
https://drillordrop.com/2017-headlines/
https://drillordrop.com/2016-drilling-headlines-archive/
https://drillordrop.com/2018/03/28/europas-leith-hill-oil-drilling-plans-contain-significant-errors-inconsistencies-and-omissions-review/?share=facebook
https://drillordrop.com/sites/
https://drillordrop.com/2018/03/28/europas-leith-hill-oil-drilling-plans-contain-significant-errors-inconsistencies-and-omissions-review/
https://drillordrop.com/2018/06/19/live-news-update-day-1-of-inquiry-into-ineos-shale-gas-plans-for-marsh-lane/
https://drillordrop.com/tag/drilling/
https://drillordrop.com/tag/public-consultation/
https://drillordrop.com/tag/failure/
https://drillordrop.com/contact/
https://drillordrop.com/2017/04/06/consultation-opens-on-permit-applications-for-europas-leith-hill-drilling-site/
https://drillordrop.com/2018/03/28/europas-leith-hill-oil-drilling-plans-contain-significant-errors-inconsistencies-and-omissions-review/?replytocom=68344#respond
consult.environment-agency.gov.uk
gov.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain name:
europaoil.co.uk

Registrant:
Identity Protect Limited

Registrant type:
UK Limited Company, (Company number: 7407280)

Registrant's address:
PO Box 786
Hayes
Middlesex
UB3 9TR
United Kingdom

Data validation:
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 28-Sep-2017

Registrar:
123-Reg Limited t/a 123-reg [Tag = 123-REG]
URL: http://www.123-reg.co.uk

Relevant dates:
Registered on: 02-Mar-2018
Expiry date: 02-Mar-2019
Last updated: 02-Mar-2018

Registration status:
Registered until expiry date.

Name servers:
ns.123-reg.co.uk 212.67.202.2
ns2.123-reg.co.uk 62.138.132.21

WHOIS lookup made at 07:42:04 16-Mar-2018

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2018.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER co.uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS europaoil.co.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

OWNER

  ORGANIZATION Identity Protect Limited

TYPE
UK Limited Company, (Company number: 7407280)

ADDRESS
PO Box 786
Hayes
Middlesex
UB3 9TR
United Kingdom
Data validation:
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 28-Sep-2017

DOMAIN

  SPONSOR 123-Reg Limited t/a 123-reg [Tag = 123-REG]

  CREATED 2018-03-02

  CHANGED 2018-03-02

STATUS
Registered until expiry date.

NSERVER

  NS.123-REG.CO.UK 212.67.202.2

  NS2.123-REG.CO.UK 62.138.132.21

  NAME europaoil.co.uk

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2018.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .